What's hot ? (and I mean really ...) - scroll down for more
1).  Code Templating - advanced usage of delegates & generics: my slides & demos are available for download! CodeProject article is also available.

2).  My series "TDD in the eyes of a simpleminded" is in progress(including code!): preface, part1, part2, Q&A 1, Manual Stub .vs. Mock Stub

3).  TDD Workshop: SeeCompass v0.1 and v0.2 are out.
# Tuesday, September 30, 2008

One of the biggest challenges in management is be able to track your own rhythm, making sure your plans are executed and things go smoothly.

In my previous post about Driven By Self Organization I stressed the importance of making things visible and plan for the future. How can one set the environment of the team to drive the entire team to success?

Thinking about it lately made me think that I have my own thoughts about what should be visible, how the team should react internally and how should one behave in such team as a Team Lead. Don't get me wrong, I don't have 30 years of experience leading small<->giant teams for small<->giant companies, these ideas are solely based on my gut feelings: making things SIMPLE (KISS) so the entire team will be driven by self-organization without the "burden" of self-management. If things are easy to do, it's easier to get better at them.

The trick is to allow all of the members in the team to be part of the organize->execute game. Some will play, some won't, but they will all be affected by the always-ready environment and notice how inner-interaction change their day. By making it visible, they will be motivated to take action (it will feel natural). I came up with this drawing to expose our sprint plans and progress:

 

 image

 

This is a very SIMPLE presentation of the current sprint features and every-day progress - "cards" will move between columns as people work on them.
There are some magic "self organization" tricks integrated into this 1-Visible-view:

  1. Achievement-based planning: Before arranging the features/cards, we try to set the "deliveries" for the week. This is a free-text (don't be tempted to make it a list of features) ideas to "set the mood" for the week. It will describe features we want to finish, some design we need to handle before the next week, some quality check we want to pass ("make sure no critical/major bugs are open") etc. They help to plan the week as they define goals that are measurable, driving the team to achievement-based planning rather than like-best-do-first development.
  2. Visibility is key: Every member of the team knows exactly what's left for the entire team on a weekly level. No more "but I finished all my tasks two days earlier than we've talked! what can I do that Joe is new here and couldn't continue as you thought? oh, I didn't know we are dependent on his task before we can release the package..."
  3. Help each other: remind yourselves that things need to be completed, help one another by helping out when someone is behind of schedule (alright Joe, I'll take Feature A, don't worry). The board will make it easier to know "where can I help?"
  4. We want Quality: Nothing is DONE until it's tested and fixed. The idea of splitting "coded" tasks from "tested" tasks is to set the mood for "production ready" code.
  5. Small goals are easier to achieve: Splitting the sprint into smaller chunks make it easier to win small battles. Each week defines small trophies - the "deliveries" we promised for that week.
  6. Plan leftovers for tomorrow: at the end of every week\sprint, you could easily see what was left. Discuss why it failed and plan it for tomorrow (=next week or next sprint).

 

Team Lead in such a team will mostly act as a coach, helping the team members to split the features into tasks, remove obstacles, motivate cooperation and taking notes about "how can we get better?". Most importantly, it will allow her (or him) to be productive and feel he can help the team's effort instead of the constant-chaos feeling managers tend to have when things go poorly. The team members are aware of the plans and can balance the efforts to break loose of this chaos-like feeling.

Posted by Oren Ellenbogen 
30/09/2008 06:07, Israel time UTC+03:00,     Comments [0]  | 

Think about a young fellow, wanting to get into shape. Here are 2 scenarios of how one can tackle that wish:

1. Create a plan and "manage yourself" to keep it.

   20:00 - set the clock to 06:00
   06:00 - wake up, make sure you're not falling back to sleep! get dressed etc
   06:15 - make sure to eat something small and drink some water
   06:35 - run 5km
   08:00 - make sure your bag is ready for school
   08:15 - go to school
   ...
   20:00 - set the clock to 06:00


2.
Organize things to drive your day:

   20:00 - put your shoes next to your bed, set your clock to 06:00 and set it FAR from the bed, prepare a little something to eat for tomorrow morning, prepare your bag for (tomorrow's) school.
   06:00 - wake up - go close the damn clock (you need to stand in order to do it), get dressed etc.
   06:15 - eat something small and drink some water
   06:35 - run 5km
   08:00 - relax for a few minutes and then go to school
   ...
   20:00 - put your shoes next to your bed, set your clock to 06:00 and set it FAR from the bed, prepare a little something to eat for tomorrow morning, prepare your bag for (tomorrow's) school.


Where most of us fail?

I might be wrong, but it seems that a lot of us (myself included) simply can't manage our time wisely during the day, for long period of time. It's too easy to forget something to do TODAY when you had to force yourself to plan it TODAY. It's too easy to fail. It's too easy to stop the rhythm.

This is why most of us can't lose weight, can't get into shape, can't read 5 books every month etc.


Driven by Self-organization

To me, it means that I want to set my environment to drive me into success. If I'll take the time to prepare my tomorrow, little chance I'll fail due to laziness: (1) I'm planning for TOMORROW, so what do I care to invest the time? I only plan things and set the environment / mood. I don't need to run the 5km now, I only want to make sure it will be easier to achieve tomorrow and (2) tomorrow morning, surprise surprise, everything is ready for me! I don't need to wake up and find out that I forgot a stupid thing like the fact that my shoes are in the washing machine. The rules are pretty easy: de-couple planning from performing and make sure everything you need for those actions are visible and available for the time you'll need them.


Although it seems like planning is more tedious than actually doing the task, planning for the future is quite relaxing. Try it: plan your tomorrow at the end of today, think about what should be set so your tomorrow will go smoothly. It will make it easier for you to come in the morning and simply perform, without the burden of planning fast to perform now:

"hhmmm... alright, it's Wednesday, what should I do today... gosh, so many things to complete! Maybe I'll start with sending those emails... naaa.. don't have power for that now.. maybe I'll finish that task I promised yesterday! naa.. she don't need it for today anyway... crap! I don't have the energy to deal with it! alright, first thing is to grab a cup of coffee".

This leads to "do what I like best first" syndrome.


At the end of the day, before going home, go over the things you've accomplished and try to see what is left for tomorrow. Relax, you don't need to do those chores now. Write everything you should accomplish for tomorrow down (with time estimations) and go home smiling, knowing that your tomorrow is best planned for achievements rather than for your personal whims.

Posted by Oren Ellenbogen 
30/09/2008 05:12, Israel time UTC+03:00,     Comments [1]  | 
# Tuesday, September 16, 2008

I'm preparing a set of articles regarding Microsoft CCR and Parallel Extensions, trying to explain the multi threading libraries supplied by MS and how they are going to change our life in the multi-core world.

I thought about starting with some architecture point of view for each library, going over the data structures and then demonstrate usage for real life scenarios. I'll start with level 100 articles and dive deeper until complex scenarios and how to harness the framework's full power to your needs.

We had the pleasure here at Delver working with CCR so I'll share with you some of the code base we created on top of it, some tips for using it correctly and my take about using these libraries in mainstream applications.

 

Some nice articles to get you started if you didn't hear about these libraries so far:

Parallel Programming with .NET : Most Common Performance Issues in Parallel Programs

Concurrent Affairs: Concurrency and Coordination Runtime -- MSDN Magazine, September 2006

Channel9 Wiki: Concurrency Runtime

Parallel Programming with .NET : Coordination Data Structures Overview

Parallel Programming with .NET : Fork/Join parallelism with .NET CountdownEvent

Parallel Programming with .NET : Wrapping an APM implementation with Future<T>

 

Is there anything specific you're interested to read about regarding those topics ?

Posted by Oren Ellenbogen 
16/09/2008 02:58, Israel time UTC+03:00,     Comments [0]  | 
# Monday, February 04, 2008

Having to parallelize almost every bit of code here at Delver, some common patterns emerged while we wrote a lot of back-end code.
I remember reading about a new framework from Microsoft Robotics Division called "Microsoft CCR" (Concurrency and Coordination Runtime) a few months ago in the "concurrent affairs" column at the MSDN Magazine but I didn't pay much attention to it at the time. Two weeks ago, it jumped back to my mind so I revisit the article and started diving a little deeper into it, thinking about what sort of problems it can solve in my world and if it does, where could I use it to our benefit. If you don't know anything about the CCR, there is great public content published already like the CCR User Guide but I'll try to give you a 2 minutes intro of the general architecture. The way CCR is built is very much like the SOA world, using messages to communicate between "services". The major components are the Dispatcher which is actually an array of OS Threads, the DispatcherQueue which holds a queue of delegates to run so the Dispatcher can "look" at the DispatcherQueue and when it has a free OS Thread available, it pulls one delegate out of the queue and run it. So far - we've got a classic ThreadPool. There are some differences but I'll let you read about it in the User Guide. The third component, which is the most important one is Port. Think about Port as a pipe that can receive messages (FIFO style - first in, first out) and hold them until someone will know what to do with them. The last component is the "manager", the Arbiter; Arbiter expose a set of methods that allows you to listen to a given pipe and if some conditions are met on the messages the pipe contains, we can take the message(s) and transform them into a runnable delegate placed in the DispatcherQueue.

One of the goals for this library is the make sure you've got much less places to go wrong, by exposing a set of common async patterns you can easily use to guarantee clean(er) code that is easier to read. Think about sending messages from one pipe to another, creating a flow-based code via messages rather than spaghetti code with a lot of messy indentation. This is a very powerful architecture.
Obviously, the entire CCR framework is thread-safe by design so no need to protect the library. A simple example:


using (Dispatcher dispatcher = new Dispatcher(5, "my_dispatcher")) //5 OS threads
using (DispatcherQueue queue = new DispatcherQueue("my_queue", dispatcher))
{
    Port<Uri> urlsPort = new Port<Uri>();
    
    Arbiter.Activate(queue,
        Arbiter.Receive(true, urlsPort, delegate(Uri uri) {
            // some code(run async!): for example we can fetch the uri content(HTML) and persist it to your Hard Disk..
         })
    );

    urlsPort.Post(new Uri("http://www.lnbogen.com"));
    urlsPort.Post(new Uri("http://www.delver.com"));
}

There is no need to create an array of Threads and some sort of Queue<Uri> in order to pull the items. The "ThreadPool" is implemented as part of the CCR.
So far no big deal right? well, it turns out that you can easily write common patterns with much less complexity: almost no locks, less spaghetti code and much less code in general.

One of the patterns we (all of us) use a lot is the "execute-and-wait-till-finish" pattern where you've got a list of independent items you want to run in parallel, but you want your main thread to wait for them to finish before continue. The simplest way to achieve it is by creating an array of Thread, activating them with a delegate and then call Join() on each one of the Threads. Let's define a few more requirements for this pattern:

  1. We want to be able to know about all the errors that occurred during the execution.
  2. We want to be able to set a timeout so each operation(inside a Thread) won't take more than a sensible time.
  3. We want to be able to know which items were timed out and when.
  4. We want to be able to know which items were completed successfully.
  5. BONUS: We want to avoid writing the obvious. 

Well, in order to implement these requirements from scratch, we need to use an outer timer with some sort of List (for example) so each thread will "register" to it when it begins and "unregister" when it's done. The timer should be able to interrupt the thread and be optimized to "wake up" as soon as possible (determined by the registered threads and which thread needs to wake up first(next in line)). In addition, we need some sort of List of exceptions to collect all the exceptions that occurred and make sure we lock shared objects. We'll need to use Thread[] and some sort of Queue to enqueue\dequeue items to\from it. A lot of code for a simple pattern.

With Microsoft CCR it's much easier.
Assuming that we want to handle a list of strings:

List<string> messagesToWorkOn = new List<string>();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
   messagesToWorkOn.Add("message " + i);

Here is the final API I've implemented on top of the CCR:

using (SpawnAndWaitPattern<string> saw = new SpawnAndWaitPattern<string>(5, "mythreadspool"))
{
   AggregatedResult<string> result = saw.Execute(messagesToWorkOn, TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(500),
                                             delegate(string msg)
                                             {
                                                if (msg.Contains("1"))
                                                   Thread.Sleep(2000); // simulate time-out
                                                else if (msg.Contains("5"))
                                                   throw new ArgumentException("5 is a very bad value..."); // simulate exception
   
                                                Console.WriteLine("The message: " + msg + " processed successfully.");
                                             });

   Console.WriteLine("Done!");
   Console.WriteLine("Summarized Report:\n completed results: " 
      + result.SuccessfulItems.Count + "\n exceptions occurred: " + result.FaultedItems.Count 
      + "\n timed-out results: " + result.TimedoutItems.Count);
}

We've got 5 OS Threads, we're waiting for up to 0.5 second per item and we've got a full result object, holding all the requirements from above.

The code of SpawnAndWaitPattern class is quite neat and contains 0 locks (on my behalf, the CCR manage its own locks). The CCR schedule the tasks for me; combining it with thread-safe Port and we've got a very powerful yet simple framework at our hands. I decided to attach the entire solution (with A LOT of nice-green-comments) including the Ccr.Core.dll file so you could play with it:

CcrPatterns.rar (162.64 KB)

Have fun.

Posted by Oren Ellenbogen 
04/02/2008 06:25, Israel time UTC+02:00,     Comments [2]  | 
# Friday, January 25, 2008

Alright alright, so I didn't post anything for... a decade or so.
but I'm here (at the office that is) all day long, being a part of a great Team, building the greatest\coolest piece of software I've ever dream of.

I promised myself that I'll be short this time so here it goes, Oren's 60 seconds update:

  1. We've changed our name from Semingo to Delver (delver: (n) deep thinker; one who investigates data).
    Hopefully (if God will hear his little buddy here), the phrase "To delve" will catch up with the scary "Google-it".
  2. We're going to show our product to the world at the DEMO conference (28-30 January, yes, in 4 days!) in Palm Desert, CA.
    If you want to be one of our first beta users, please go to our site: www.delver.com and register (we'll send you an email once we'll release our beta).
  3. We're looking for super talented folks to join our amazing Team, interested?
Short, to the point, no technical buzzzzz. I'm feeling violated.
 
update:
here are a few links from interesting articles about us:
 - http://www.delver.com/about.htm (from our home site)
 - http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1127798146/bclid1396518815/bctid1392526686 (6 minutes of live! demo\video, presented by our CEO at DEMO conference)
 http://www.somewhatfrank.com/2008/02/silicon-valley.html (5 minutes demo\video from IsraelWebTour 2008)
 - http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delver_reinvents_search.php (great summary to understand our product)
 
 
Next post - some cool multi-threading code and how to test it without wanting to stick a nail in your eye (or someone's else eye).
Now I'm feeling better...
Posted by Oren Ellenbogen 
25/01/2008 12:46, Israel time UTC+02:00,     Comments [0]  | 
# Sunday, November 18, 2007

Imagine that you're living with one hell of a crazy wife. Every day she's giving you bunch of tasks. "Mow the grass", "water the plants", "take out the garbage", "replace the light in the kitchen", "build a fence" etc. For every task you complete, she goes bananas and create 10,000 more on the spot, all related to the task itself ("build a fence" leads to "paint the fence", "put a nice sign on the fence", "practice your wax-on, wax-off" … you get the drift). Reluctant to perform all of these tasks but smart enough to know that you'll lose at least 50% of your property (divorce are nasty), you start collecting these tasks (you write them on papers). You take one paper (single task), perform it and return to your wife with a big-fat smile of your face. She, in return, creates 10,000 new related tasks to the one you've just completed, write them on paper and put it in a BIG box. Every once in a while she's not waiting for you and adding "main" tasks to the box by herself. After performing one task, you pick another one from the box (FIFO), without knowing if it's a main task or not, you go to your way "eager" to perform that task as requested (as if you have a choice). This goes on and on and on…

The box is the tricky part here. Can one box hold billions of papers? hardly. So you start collecting boxes and now it's getting harder as you need to add new boxes when needed, find the "right" box to pull tasks from and making sure these boxes won't break (maintenance) with time.

Here are a few assumptions you can take as is:

  1. Your wife is looking for perfection but only in the "main" tasks which means that if you were to build the fence, you have to do it perfectly so each mini task related to it is crucial.
  2. Your wife tends to forget things so you can assume that occasionally, she'll add new "main" tasks that were already performed or exist in a different box.
  3. You can't throw away tasks "just because" as you don't know if a "mini task" will be thrown by mistake (= your wife will be pissed off. 50% is gone.).
  4. Be cool - you won't perform the same task twice. This one is on me.
  5. Drinking RedBull (or XL or whatever energy drink you're familiar with) 24-7-365 you don't need to rest. You don't need to sleep. Think robot (funny combination, for 2007).

How to store billions of tasks?

I kinda like the "green feeling" of a forest. Oh right, we also need them in order to breath (El Gor is more convincing than I. Thank God). Most importantly, it costs a lot of money buying so many papers! And the boxes!  You'll need a lot of green ones ($) - not trees but we can't "breath" without them as well). Oh well… You're starting to build a "Boxing mechanism", hire a few guys to maintain them, getting a VC to give you some extra $$$ and after a few months\years you got it cover!

What do you do if you don't have the extra $$$ or more important the extra time to develop this kind of storage system?

How to store billions of tasks? You don't. You can't
In most scenarios, when things seem too difficult to accomplish (with the given limits) try a different angle: "If you don't like the answer, ask a different question".

We know that each task creates a lot of new related tasks right? We also know that keeping those new tasks is the tricky part (the BIG box problem) so what else can be done? Let's change the question. "How do I make my wife happy?" seems like a smarter question. If it's expensive to save those tasks why not doing these related tasks on the spot instead of storing them in the box(es)?  How is this going to help us? Now we can throw away tasks because these tasks will be added later on (assumption #2. Thank God your wife is not the robot). Assuming that we can save about 1,000,000 papers in one big box – we're all set. If the box is full, we'll simply throw away new "main" tasks, feeling good as we KNOW that we'll get to them later on (again, assumption #2). Now all we need is one simple box with a limited amount of papers. Less $$$ to waste and much simpler storage system to develop.


Crap, it just hit me. I'm doing some cool sh$% at Semingo! Join us!

Posted by Oren Ellenbogen 
18/11/2007 12:54, Israel time UTC+02:00,     Comments [5]  | 
# Thursday, November 15, 2007

Well this is mostly a good backup-post, but heck maybe a few other (VERY COOL) geeks will find it interesting.
Looking for some cool IDE colors\fonts, I came up with this:

[ Regular mode ... ]

ide_colors_regular.png

 

[ Marking the for loop ... ]

ide_colors_marking_text.png

 

[ Output window ]

ide_colors_output.png


I based my colors on ZenBurn.
The font I'm using is Consolas.
Read all about it in Jeff Atwood's post.

You can download MY version here: OrenEllenbogen_DarkSchema.rar (58 KB)

Note: if you're using ReSharper you'll have to disable the "Highlight current line" option. 

Posted by Oren Ellenbogen 
15/11/2007 12:34, Israel time UTC+02:00,     Comments [3]  | 
# Saturday, October 20, 2007

What is more important to you - having the brightest dude in the world in your team, doing his magic with God-like authority or real "together-will-conquer-the-world" Team work? Tricky question...

house_tv_show.jpg 

For those of you who don't know the TV series "House", this is your wake up call! Go see it. Now. Seriously.
Well, if you don't have the time or you're just too damn eager to read my post, we'll, "you're an idiot!", but that's your right so I'll give you a short summary: Dr. House, played by the genius actor Hugh Laurie, is the go-to-guy for all the rare cases where the rest of the doctors go bananas. With his extremely cynical point of view and shameless wittiness, combined with a very bright, analytic and (yet) creative thinking, he manage to solve all (we'll, almost) of these cases and still being a complete jerk to his "teammates" during the show. Just a few pearls from Wikiquote so you'll get the drift:

         Dr. Cuddy: You don't prescribe medicine based on guesses. At least we don't since Tuskeegee and Mengele. 
         Dr. House: You're comparing me to a Nazi? [admiringly] Nice ...

Lucille: I'm not pregnant.
Dr. House: Sorry, you don't get to make that call unless you have a stethoscope. Union rules.

If you ask me, I would pick House any day. Now, if any of you know such a man, let him know that we're at Semingo are hiring; Till then, I guess that I would stick to a strong Team and real commitment instead of software-Nazi.

I'm lying. I don't think that following someone blindly is for me. I don't believe in this kind of leadership. I grew up at the court, playing Basketball since I was ~9, there is nothing I love more than genuine Team spirit. Facing the fact that "white man can't jump" quite early in my life, I realized that Michael Jordan can be rest assured, I'm not going to steal his glory. Knowing that and still being the competitive guy that I am, there is no other choice but to build a strong Team and having fun together. It worked for me so far.

Shame though, It would have been funny working with someone like House; If only life were a TV show...

Posted by Oren Ellenbogen 
20/10/2007 05:16, Israel time UTC+02:00,     Comments [6]  | 
# Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Moti and I have decided to form an invite-only Scrum Clan.
We would like to tag Pasha Bitz (snapshot below) as the 3rd clan member.

Pasha_Scrum_Lover.jpg

Pasha, choose carefully, you can only tag one Scrum-Lover like yourself to this distinguish clan ;)


p.s
- If you want to be part of the Scrum Clan, please drop a comment and you *might* get an invitation...

                                                    

                                 Scrum Rules !

Posted by Oren Ellenbogen 
10/10/2007 12:47, Israel time UTC+02:00,     Comments [1]  | 
# Monday, September 10, 2007

Let me start with an out-loud recap of this post: Agile is not something you can put on a bread nor is it "a certain path to success".

It's about STATE OF MIND.

If I had to describe the meaning of "Agile" to a new teammate I would say: Agile is a constant thinking about how we, AS A TEAM, can produce working features to our users with high quality within a short time-frame.

Don't worry:
It's really OK to provide only a subset of feature(s) in one sprint.
It's really OK to leave SOME designing\architecture issues for later on as long as the high-level architecture is good enough (=you're comfortable with it) to answer the big questions.
It's really OK to implement only two REALLY-DONE-HIGH-QUALITY features in one sprint over four semi-working-not-demoable features.

The key here though is not really the practices, it's about the big bullets(again, state of mind):

1). Produce value for your customers and adjust\adopt early.
2). Build a Team (self leadership).

These ideas are hard to implement and require special kind of people. Putting the Team in front of yourself is not a very job-secure attitude.  The ability to help your teammates, shift tasks, taking ownership, critisize yourself and your teammates and getting better, produce high quality design, tests and code - all of it - requires versatile people with unique state of mind (and unique abilities, of course). It's worth it. When things glue, it's a real magic; Things start to get going by the Team, improvements and features starting to come from the developers\QA\Graphic Designer, adjustments are made on a regular basis, changes are welcome and productivity is celebrated.

You can feel something is going right.
That's Agile.

Posted by Oren Ellenbogen 
10/09/2007 08:21, Israel time UTC+03:00,     Comments [1]  |